Re: Reply to libris

From: "Kåre A. Lie"
Message: 6576
Date: 2005-02-17

At 21:27 17.02.2005 +0600, you wrote:

>But I am thinking: is it possible to call our approach using RG also the
>trilinear method? For, we also have Pali, word for word translation and
>modern English (where necessary). Or perhaps we have got four lines when
>word-to-word relations are also accounted for. How should we call it?
>quadrilinear method? Sorry for my stupid question but I just can't think
>of a suitable term. My English is still in need of further improvement.

Maybe interlinear can be used. This term is not tied up to any specific
number of lines.

Best regards,

Kåre A. Lie
http://www.lienet.no/

Previous in thread: 6574
Previous message: 6575
Next message: 6577

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts