> Although Zoega lists <kné> as m(asculine), I think thisYep; Zoëga aside, there seems to be unanimous agreement, and
> must be a misprint, because Cleasby/Vigfusson lists it as
> n(euter), and Gordon (An Introduction to Old Norse) uses
> it as a paradigm for a stong declension a-stem neuter
> noun, giving <kné> as the accusative plural form.