From: Bhrihskwobhloukstroy
Message: 71448
Date: 2013-10-20
> You mean Science ?
>
> Do you know that makers of Vedas have given you and the world the term
> 'science' that we call 'Vigyan', if you or your witzel or f brighenti or
> this brian scott or eist or any body among you, opens up Rigveda, wd come to
> know about that term "Vigyan" is used at least twice in Rigveda, Your witzel
> could not learn all such things even spending years and depsite inching on
> the verge of retirement, what you bad mouth can tell ?
>
> You have no idea that you are living in bottomless pool of ignorance when it
> comes to deal with Vedas and knowledge treasured in Vedas, You have only one
> choice that you run away from truth and do manipulations to cover up
> foolish thoughts on Vedic history by making a lobby and you are doing such
> acts only, otherwise if you have guts, indulge in open discussions and
> moderate yourself.
>
> Forget all other things, You don't even know how your ancestors got the term
> 'HELLO' from makers of the Vedas and you fools wd tell us vedic etymology,
> none of you have knowledge of munda the dialect spoken in India, neither you
> know if munda was at all spoken in the vedic age but you w'd count Munda
> loan words in Vedas, this is the kind of linguistics you have learnt.
>
> When it comes to surface that methdology applied in Munda projects was
> ineffecient, primitive and immature, you should go on to explore the ways to
> improve upon not to hide the holes, dont rant on "Science".
>
> None of you know over the period what changes came into munda but you fools
> wd run to build theories and if we don't listen to you, you wd call yourself
> having scientific blend of mind.
>
> Your discussions exposes all , you all have never read Rigveda's all
> mantras, not even once but by making lobbies think we wd listem to your
> foolish talks..
>
> Who makes lobby. those who are living in fools paradise, what to expect from
> illiterates.
>
> Keep your bad mouth under control !!
>
> Lalit Mishra
>
> ------------------------------
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 10:27 PM IST Bhrihskwobhloukstroy wrote:
>
>>You damned stupid fool little ignorant guy can spend your useless life
>>without knowing anything of Science, but in writing such rubbish are
>>really acting against India's History and the deep Prehistory of Veda.
>>Linguistics can provide precious insights into India's Antiquities,
>>far more ancient than you can think, but evidently you prefer a
>>colonialist approach. Shame on you!
>>
>>2013/10/20, Lalit Mishra <litsol@...>:
>>>
>>> Linguistics is no rocket scince, not more than a lame duck tool in its
>>> curent level, The way you people project the absurd theories like
>>> AIT/AMT/OIT etc, gathers no value among us the young Aryans of India, You
>>> can remain in a small narrow world of your that you make any sense to
>>> us, If
>>> you people have any sense of a language, you could make better structure
>>> of
>>> your illogical language that you call english, and for that also
>>> motivation
>>> and framework you got from Indian Aryans.
>>>
>>> Linguistic can only show that language "A" has shared a few words from
>>> the
>>> other language say "B" and if history is known, it can say something
>>> about
>>> direction the word is moved over the time, beyond this, it knows nothing.
>>>
>>> Sanskrit is only source, only proto europian languages there is no PIE
>>> etc,
>>> dont think that you can befool Indians other than those who are paid in
>>> profession of history and those historians work or opinion, dosnt have
>>> value
>>> in India as we know that such Indian historians are no better than copy
>>> cat
>>> who speak in his western master's language, worthless guys !!
>>>
>>>
>>> The fun and folly that you people make with respect to making decisions
>>> on
>>> antiquity and origin of Vedic Homeland and that with no knowledge of
>>> Vedas, shows your ingratitude only and with this level of so called
>>> linguistics, there is no absurdity to this scale, Never be in illusion of
>>> that sort.
>>>
>>> First learn some Sanskrit and then develop skills to understand meaning
>>> of
>>> Vedic mantra and get yourself evaluated yourself by Indians and then only
>>> dare talking on Vedas,Same is the languages like munda that you people
>>> neither understand nor speak and still go on to build grammar and then
>>> call
>>> yourself open minded.
>>>
>>> Madness is not openness !!
>>>
>>> Great !!
>>>
>>> Lalit Mishra
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Brian M. Scott <bm.brian@...>
>>> To: Lalit Mishra <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
>>> Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 3:11 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [tied] RE: Hindu noise-makers, Elst and OIT -- a review
>>>
>>>
>>> At 4:16:51 AM on Sunday, October 20, 2013, Lalit Mishra wrote:> Dear F
>>> Brighenty,Still can’t spell his name, I see.> Austroasiatic etymologies
>>> are
>>> not applicable for MunaMunda. And your assertion is ignorant rubbish.>
>>> language, no use citing Austroasiatic etymology, since,> these two
>>> languages, are in fact, dialects not the> languages and as I revealed
>>> over
>>> here, the methodology> used in the research as well as scope frozen for
>>> the>
>>> research is incorrect for the reason that research has not> taken the
>>> whole
>>> eco-system into account, I w'd say the> methodology used was very
>>> primitive, immature.You’ve ‘revealed’ nothing of the kind: you’ve
>>> merelydemonstrated conclusively that you’re wholly ignorant of
>>> andtherefore
>>> completely unqualified to discuss linguistics.This list has a long
>>> tradition
>>> of being open-minded nearlyto the point of letting its brains fall out,
>>> but
>>> thisnonsense isn’t even borderline, and I’m perfectly willing tostart
>>> rejecting it.Brian
>>>
>