Re: Linguistics On Vedic Issue is a Lame Duck Tool

You damned stupid fool little ignorant guy can spend your useless life
without knowing anything of Science, but in writing such rubbish are
really acting against India's History and the deep Prehistory of Veda.
Linguistics can provide precious insights into India's Antiquities,
far more ancient than you can think, but evidently you prefer a
colonialist approach. Shame on you!

2013/10/20, Lalit Mishra <litsol@...>:

>
> Linguistics is no rocket scince, not more than a lame duck tool in its
> curent level, The way you people project the absurd theories like
> AIT/AMT/OIT etc, gathers no value among us the young Aryans of India, You
> can remain in a small narrow world of your that you make any sense to us, If
> you people have any sense of a language, you could make better structure of
> your illogical language that you call english, and for that also motivation
> and framework you got from Indian Aryans.
>
> Linguistic can only show that language "A" has shared a few words from the
> other language say "B" and if history is known, it can say something about
> direction the word is moved over the time, beyond this, it knows nothing.
>
> Sanskrit is only source, only proto europian languages there is no PIE etc,
> dont think that you can befool Indians other than those who are paid in
> profession of history and those historians work or opinion, dosnt have value
> in India  as we know that such Indian historians are no better than copy cat
> who speak in his western master's language, worthless guys !!
>
>
> The fun and folly that you people make with respect to making decisions on
> antiquity and origin of Vedic Homeland and that with no knowledge of
> Vedas, shows your ingratitude only and with this level of so called
> linguistics, there is no absurdity to this scale, Never be in illusion of
> that sort.
>
> First learn some Sanskrit and then develop skills to understand meaning of
> Vedic mantra and get yourself evaluated yourself by Indians and then only
> dare talking on Vedas,Same is the languages like munda that you people
> neither understand nor speak and still go on to build grammar and then call
> yourself open minded.
>
> Madness is not openness !!
>
> Great !!
>
> Lalit Mishra
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Brian M. Scott <bm.brian@...>
> To: Lalit Mishra <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 3:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [tied] RE: Hindu noise-makers, Elst and OIT -- a review
>
>
> At 4:16:51 AM on Sunday, October 20, 2013, Lalit Mishra wrote:> Dear F
> Brighenty,Still can’t spell his name, I see.> Austroasiatic etymologies are
> not applicable for MunaMunda. And your assertion is ignorant rubbish.>
> language, no use citing Austroasiatic etymology, since,> these two
> languages, are in fact, dialects not the> languages and as I revealed over
> here, the methodology> used in the research as well as scope frozen for the>
> research is incorrect for the reason that research has not> taken the whole
> eco-system into account, I w'd say the> methodology used was very
> primitive, immature.You’ve ‘revealed’ nothing of the kind: you’ve
> merelydemonstrated conclusively that you’re wholly ignorant of andtherefore
> completely unqualified to discuss linguistics.This list has a long tradition
> of being open-minded nearlyto the point of letting its brains fall out, but
> thisnonsense isn’t even borderline, and I’m perfectly willing tostart
> rejecting it.Brian
>