Re: Who can explain the comparisons?

----- Original Message -----
From: "kishore patnaik" <kishorepatnaik09@...>
To: <indiaarcheology@yahoogroups.com>; <ancientindia@yahoogroups.com>;
<vedichistory@yahoogroups.com>; <akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com>;
<abhinavagupta@...>; <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>;
<indo_iranian@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 6:10 PM
Subject: [tied] Who can explain the comparisons?


> Dear all,
>
> Those who think Aryans have come from Urals or somewhere else seem to be
> getting into more and more soup, not palatable one at that.
============
Indo-european Indic probably came from Vad, Moksha and Alatyr Rivers Valleys
in Russia
while Indo-european Iranic came from Dniepr, Dniestr southern Russian
Valleys.
Indo-european data make it clear
and Uralic data make it clear as well.
Where is the problem ?
Seems like clear water.
Arnaud
===============
> To start with, one would be tempted to say that the horse sacrifice of
> Altai
> Turks of the Urals is a pre runner of Aryan aswamedha. MW would want us to
> believe that Br Up's Dadhici and Aswin's story is a replay of a long
> tradition in Urals when the man is sacrificed and his head is replaced
> with
> that of a horse.
>
> So long it is fine, before you are stuck with a Dravidian language in
> Urals. Would you want to say that even that is a pre runner of Indian
> Dravidian languages?
=======
Dravidian is more entitled than Indo-Iranian to claim Autochthony in India.
It makes no sense to push Dravidian out of India,
worst of all, in Urals.
Arnaud
=============
>
> Not very comfortable question to answer , right??
>
> regards,
>
> Kishore patnaik
========

Everything is clear.
Dravidian is autochthonous to southern India.
Indic came from the mid-stream southern bank of the Volga River.
Where is the uncomfortable question ?
Obvious questions are cake.
Arnaud
============