***
Projecting *t? to a time frame beyond Nostratic, the parent of PIE and PAA,
is unnecessary.
P.
***
There is a clear necessity to have both *d and *t?
to account for clear correspondances.
PIE *d = ST *dz = PU -r- = PAA *dh
PIE *t? = ST *ts = PU -l- = PAA *t?
Arnaud
===================
***
"Development" simply means what the PIE response to Nostratic *t? was : PIE
*d; and the PAA response to Nostratic *t? : PAA *t.
***
*t? > PAA *t is absurd.
==========
> Nostratic *t? becomes PIE *d and PAA *t; I have 24 examples of this in my
> presently evolving essay.
> PAtrick
======
Can you provide a couple of examples ?
Arnaud
========