Re: Uralic Continuity Theory ; Paleo-Germanic lexical borrowings in

From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 54265
Date: 2008-02-28

> All these words have *k > h
> in Germanic
> and there are borrowed as h > h.
>
> This makes askon > kaska
> all the more dubious.
>
> Arnaud
- - - - - - - -
Mind the phonological systems of both languages were rather different
some 2000-3000 years before Proto-Norse
The original would have been *[h2a(h1)zg-] = */h2e(h1)sg-/ and Finnic
would have had no velar fricative at the time
J
- - - - - - - -

We have already noticed
that Northern Germanic arrived
in Scandinavia maybe between - 2500/-2000
Before Present time (Year 2000 AD).
so it does not make much sense to talk
about some hyper **before**

I disagree with the come and go
between real languages and PIE
thru Proto-Fennic and Proto-Germanic
It makes everything uncontrollable.

Arnaud
===============
> I wrote *hart might be from the root
> of s-kul-t-er
> that is to say from *k_l-t > *hart-
>
> Arnaud
> ===================
- - - - -
I misread you on that one. I get your point. Seems lika a far shot
considering the l ~ r as you yourself has pointed out.
Jouppe
- - - - -

It's not a far shot
shoulder *s-kl-ter =
shoulder *hol-t- > hart

the r / l problem is minor.

My connection is not innocent.
Cf.
Chinese koy-in "shoulder" < *kol-
PU *koyin-nal "armpit"
the place inside the shoulder...

The root *kol exists.
Substrate *hart is possible.

Arnaud

=====================