Re: Uralic Continuity Theory ; Paleo-Germanic lexical borrowings in

Below:

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "fournet.arnaud"
<fournet.arnaud@...> wrote:

> ===============
> There is nothing strange about NWGmc/Proto-Norse *X => Late Proto-
> Finnic *h , which is implied by Torsten.
> Compare the words
> haava 'wound' <= *Xawwa- > ON hogg,
> hallita (< *halti-) 'to master, to rule' <= *Xaldan 'hold'
> hamara 'back of ax, of hammer' <= *Xamara- 'stone, hammer etc.'
> haukka (< *havukka) 'falcon' <= *Xabuka-
> helppo 'easy; help' <= *Xelpo: 'help; auxiliary'
> humala 'hop' < *Xumala(n)- 'hop'
> hurskas 'righteous' <= Xurskaz 'wise'
> hypätä 'jump' <= *Xuppo:(ja)n or * Xuppjan
> Jouppe
> =================
>
> It's clear these examples have
> nothing in common with
> askon > kaska.

- - - - - - - -
Yes thats clear indeed (the original is not Proto-Germanic *askon)
J
- - - - - - - -

>
> All these words have *k > h
> in Germanic
> and there are borrowed as h > h.
>
> This makes askon > kaska
> all the more dubious.
>
> Arnaud

- - - - - - - -
Mind the phonological systems of both languages were rather different
some 2000-3000 years before Proto-Norse
The original would have been *[h2a(h1)zg-] = */h2e(h1)sg-/ and Finnic
would have had no velar fricative at the time
J
- - - - - - - -

> =============
> hartia of course comes from *Xarthia- not *s-kult-er
> Jouppe
>
> ===========
> I wrote *hart might be from the root
> of s-kul-t-er
> that is to say from *k_l-t > *hart-
>
> Arnaud
> ===================
>

- - - - -
I misread you on that one. I get your point. Seems lika a far shot
considering the l ~ r as you yourself has pointed out.
Jouppe
- - - - -