Re: Arnaud Fournet's "infix" theory

--- "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
wrote:

> Now, as for Uralic,
> I have never written it had infixes
> I think it had only suffixes.
>
> Arnaud
>
> ===================

****GK: I was misled by the wording in your next to
last paragraph, where you state that Uralic had no
prefixes and no infixes in -r- and -l-, which could be
understood as implying it had other infixes... Thanks
for the clarification.****

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ