Re: Arnaud Fournet's "infix" theory

From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 52865
Date: 2008-02-12

--- "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
wrote:

> Now, as for Uralic,
> I have never written it had infixes
> I think it had only suffixes.
>
> Arnaud
>
> ===================

****GK: I was misled by the wording in your next to
last paragraph, where you state that Uralic had no
prefixes and no infixes in -r- and -l-, which could be
understood as implying it had other infixes... Thanks
for the clarification.****

=============

Pas de problème !

It's always interesting to look at
what other people understand
Sometimes you believe you are clear
But it happens other people read *things*
that you did not mean.
C'est la vie !
Next time, I'll try to be clearer
from the start.

Arnaud


=================