Re: Hungarian "gold"

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>
wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@>
> wrote:
> >
> > To give you another example
> >
> > THE hungarians rejects today their own chronicle written by
> > themselves : Gesta Hungarorum (written around 1200-1300). They
> > consider their own chronicle as pure imagination with All the

names

> > specified inside as pure inventions only because at the moment at
> > their arrival in Transylvannia (around 950-1000 so only 200 years
> > before the times when their Chronicle was written), so only 200
> > years after their arrival in Transylvannia Gesta Hungarorum

(their

> > own Chronicle) "talks" about
> >
> > "GELOU - DUX BLACHORUM as the Ruler of Transylvania"
> >
> >
> > Marius
> >
>
> Is something like this: a French Guy writes Today a Chronicle

about

> Napoleon's Wars and some other French guys 800 later will say that
> this Chronicle (written only 200 years later since Napoleon's Wars)
> was pure imagination because in the future Corsica will be a bigger
> state than today and because Napoleon was Corsican....and due to

this

> Napoleon was a completly invented person by that writer.
>
> Or an American write today a Chronicle about George Washington (so
> about 200-300 years later) and 800 later somebody (named also
> George?) will say that this was only a pure imagination ...and that
> George Washington never existed ...it was a pure legend invented

200

> years later to justify a glorious story about US-Formation
>
> Or somebody write today so 300 years later about Petru The Great

of

> Russia and somebody else after other 800 years will say that this
> Chronicle is a pure imagination....and that Petru the Great Never
> Existed being only a legend...only because he don't like Russians
>
> Etc...
>
> Is almost unbelievable but this 'scientific considerations' are
> present today in the official history of Hungary
>
> Marius
>

I need to apologize here for some of my personal considerations
present in some of my previous last postings

(I was really disturb about the great numbers of false considerations
and mistakes presented with bad intentions by another member here,
but this cannot be an excuse for me )

I also consider that George needs to apologize here too...

I will close here any discussion in relation with Hungarian arany and
I will try to avoid in the future any similar situation.

Marius