--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>
wrote:
>
> To give you another example
>
> THE hungarians rejects today their own chronicle written by
> themselves : Gesta Hungarorum (written around 1200-1300). They
> consider their own chronicle as pure imagination with All the names
> specified inside as pure inventions only because at the moment at
> their arrival in Transylvannia (around 950-1000 so only 200 years
> before the times when their Chronicle was written), so only 200
> years after their arrival in Transylvannia Gesta Hungarorum (their
> own Chronicle) "talks" about
>
> "GELOU - DUX BLACHORUM as the Ruler of Transylvania"
>
>
> Marius
>
Is something like this: a French Guy writes Today a Chronicle about
Napoleon's Wars and some other French guys 800 later will say that
this Chronicle (written only 200 years later since Napoleon's Wars)
was pure imagination because in the future Corsica will be a bigger
state than today and because Napoleon was Corsican....and due to this
Napoleon was a completly invented person by that writer.
Or an American write today a Chronicle about George Washington (so
about 200-300 years later) and 800 later somebody (named also
George?) will say that this was only a pure imagination ...and that
George Washington never existed ...it was a pure legend invented 200
years later to justify a glorious story about US-Formation
Or somebody write today so 300 years later about Petru The Great of
Russia and somebody else after other 800 years will say that this
Chronicle is a pure imagination....and that Petru the Great Never
Existed being only a legend...only because he don't like Russians
Etc...
Is almost unbelievable but this 'scientific considerations' are
present today in the official history of Hungary
Marius