From: Sean Whalen
Message: 45150
Date: 2006-06-27
> If /a/ in <tardus> is not derivedThere are cases of *wr. > ar before w or u at a
> from an original *e, then what is the origin of /a/
> in this Latin word?
> This dictionary similarlyI believe there are some cases where nasalized *e
> derives Latin <mari:tus> "probably" from the IE
> base *meri "young wife", akin to *meryo-, "young
> man", in Sanskrit <marya-> "man, young man, suitor".
> If this is the basis of <mari:tus>, how would Latin
> /a/ derive from IE *e? I believe there are a
> significant number of other Latin words in this
> dictionary with /a/ held to be from *e. Under what
> conditions would IE *e become /a/ in Latin?
> Could this supposed change of *e > /a/Maybe.
> account for the /a/ in <maneo>?
> (And could thisThere are many changes that create a; which ones are
> account for cases of /a/ in Celtic as well (ref. my
> earlier question on the origin of Celtic /a/)?)