Re: [tied] trzymac'

On Mon, 29 May 2006 18:57:53 +0000, Sergejus Tarasovas
<S.Tarasovas@...> wrote:

>--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:
>
>> Nonsense, it's t(vI)ri:má:joN, which should have shortened
>> the /i:/ if it was pretonic.
>
>But it hasn't (Slovincian -î-).

Then it wasn't pretonic, or the length is analogical after
forms in wich the i: was stressed and long (neo-acute).

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...