[tied] Re: Slavic palatalistions: why /c^/, /c/?

From: tgpedersen
Message: 41703
Date: 2005-11-02

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 13:55:13 +0000, tgpedersen
> <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> >Here's a version with even fewer rules:
>
> But they're all wrong.
>

Because...?


Torsten

Previous in thread: 41692
Next in thread: 41716
Previous message: 41702
Next message: 41704

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts