Re: [tied] Re: Slavic palatalistions: why /c^/, /c/?

From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 41716
Date: 2005-11-02

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 09:38:41 +0000, tgpedersen
<tgpedersen@...> wrote:

>--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 13:55:13 +0000, tgpedersen
>> <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>>
>> >Here's a version with even fewer rules:
>>
>> But they're all wrong.
>>
>
>Because...?

Because the rules you gave were:

>PIE > pp-PS
>*ai, *oi > *e

Obviously wrong. *ai gives /ê/, not /e/, and only after the
first palatalzation.

>pp-PS > p-PS
>*V(:) > *jV(:), /V front

Wrong as I explained (*ji would have given /i/, not /I/, in
OCS).

>p-PS > PS
>*k > *c
>*kW > *k
>PS >
>*cj > *c^

Wrong, since PIE *k and *kW before vowels merged already in
PBS, giving Slavic /k/ before back vowels, /c^/ before front
vowels (and later /c/ before secondary /ê/ from *ai, as well
as after *i(:(N))).

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...