Re: [tied] Re: Slavic palatalisations: why /c^/, /c/?

From: george knysh
Message: 41717
Date: 2005-11-02

--- Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:

> On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 09:38:41 +0000, tgpedersen
> <tgpedersen@...> wrote:


****GK: I just couldn't stand the "palatalistions" in
the subject line any more. (:=)))) Cheers!.*****




__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com

Previous in thread: 41716
Next in thread: 41756
Previous message: 41716
Next message: 41718

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts