Re: [tied] Re: Slavic palatalistions: why /c^/, /c/?

From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 41692
Date: 2005-11-01

On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 13:55:13 +0000, tgpedersen
<tgpedersen@...> wrote:

>Here's a version with even fewer rules:

But they're all wrong.

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...

Previous in thread: 41688
Next in thread: 41703
Previous message: 41691
Next message: 41693