[tied] Eurasian Proto-Language

From: Sean Whalen
Message: 34593
Date: 2004-10-11

Phonology leading to all three families:

p P t tl kj k kp
b B d dl gj g gb
B" d" dl" gj" g" gb"
f s sl xj x xf
m mv n nl? nj ng mng?
r l lj L

y w

i u
e o
a


Three tones, high (a'), mid (a), and low (a`).

Series are voiceless, voiced, glottalized and
fricative obstruents; nasals, liquids; glides; vowels.

C are labial, labiodental, dental, lateral,
palatalized velar, velar, velar and labial pronounced
at same time.

To Proto-Semitic:

f>0?
labiodental obstr>interdental
[nj]>y after more sonorant and before V
e/o>a
xj>h
x>voiced pharyngeal fric
xf>voicless phar fr
g">glottal stop
palatal stops>affricates
k/g>x/x+voice
labiovelar>velar
dental>palatal/_y
palatal>y

(presence of [mv] obviates need for prenasalized [mb]
in reconstructions).


To Eurasian (and then PIE, PU):

f>0?
glottalized>aspirated
[B"]>b"
labiodental stops>interdental
laterals>l
labial/velar>rounded velar
merger of mng and [mv]?


To PIE:

e/o>a
ng>n?
[dh]>d
[th]>f


To Proto-Uralic

C+voice -aspirate>-voice
merger of xj, x, xf?
presence of x causes V>+front
[nj]>y/_#
[mv]>m/_#

(x causes first forms of V-harmony in many languages,
other types may follow, words with original front e/i
as only vowels follow example; explains mixed forms in
Estonian because only V next to x becomes front)

(presence of mv explains various outcomes (m or w>v)
in Hungarian where others have only m).

([th] explains C that is -t at end of word and s
elsewhere in Finnish but t everywhere in other
languages).

(voiced aspirates explain origin of voiced C in
Hungarian but voiceless aspirates in Finnish (which
become geminates between vowels, elsewhere de-aspirate
later).

> Phonology of PIE
>
> Vls p t kj k kv
> Vcd b d gj g gv
> Asp bh dh gjh gh gvh
> Fric f s xj x xv
> Nas m n nj ng mv
> Liq r,l
> Gld y w
>
> i u
> a





_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com