From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 34018
Date: 2004-09-05
> george knysh wrote:am not
> > --- tolgs001 <george_st@...> wrote:
> >
> >>> Even for me looks more plausible PIE *wer-s 'rain,
> >> flood' (cf. Alb.
> >>> <vërshoj> 'to ovrflood'), I guess we can't deny the
> >> long
> >>> brotherhood between Slavs and Avars, so the name
> >> could easy
> >>> be of Avar origin <varosh> 'subburb of the castle',
> >> attested
> >>> in many place names (cf. also Vrshac in Banat).
> >>>
> >>> Konushevci
> >>
> >> cf. Hungarian város ['va:roS] "city" < vár [va:r]
> >> "fortress,
> >> castle" (< PIE *wer ?) & Romanian ora$ [o-'raS]
> >> "city".
> >>
> >> George
> >
> > *****GK: Is there anything in the archaeology of
> > Warsaw to indicate that it might have been a fortress
> > in Avar times (say up to the end of the 8th c. when
> > Avar power collapsed)? If not the above speculation is
> > rather idle.****
>
>
> that is a pertinent question regarding the arheological aspect. I
> sure how pertinent is my question:suffix?
> -why no methathesis in "Vars^-" if the "-ova" is just the simply
> I put this question because a similar sounding word presents theor
> methathesis. I mean for instance here the Sl. "vraz^a" or "vrac^"
> "vrabiI" or "vrahU", "vraz^Ida".present
> The same situation is in Bulgarian where the name "varna" does not
> the expected methathesis as in word "vrana".************
>
> Alex