Re: [tied] Re: IE prefix "*s"

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 28681
Date: 2003-12-21

21-12-03 03:21, Abdullah Konushevci wrote:

[a lot of stuff that may be skipped, sice no-one was disputing the
reconstruction *pos or rather PIE *h2p(o)- and its various derivatives]

> ALB. PAS, GEG. MBAS PRA"P. `HINTER, NACH' (idg. *pos + Demonstr. si).
> References: WP. II 78 f., WH. II 347 ff., Trautmann 207, Schwyzer Gr.
> Gr. 2, 508.
> Page(s): 841-842

According to _your own_ reference, the final <s(i)> of Alb. pas(i),
mbas(i) does not correspond to the final *s of *pos (which, it the
above-cited etymology is correct was simply dropped word-finally), but
represents the _Albanian_ pronominal element <si>, whose /s/ does not
reflect PIE *s. This proves your *pos > *pas to be wrong, since your
purpose was to give examples of PIE *s > Alb. s. Capisci?

Piotr