From: m_iacomi
Message: 26814
Date: 2003-11-02
> 02-11-03 13:37, m_iacomi wrote:That's precisely why I didn't listed other names which could be
> [...]
>> I assume you had some criteria to emphatically call these names
>> "Daco-Thracian" (especially when speaking about "caution"), but
>> there is little indication about which are those criteria. Out of
>> derivatives of "(i) bardhë" `white` (having its' correspondent in
> > Romanian "bardz(u)" `id.`) [...]
>
> Since several webpage authors deliberately spell "King Bardhyl(us)"
> à l'albanaise (and "explain" it romantically as 'White Star' or the
> like), I'd like to remind the list that the historical Bardu:lis
> [sic!] ruled Illyria, and his name could be considered
> "Daco-Thracian" only if it could be shown that Dacian, Thracian
> and Illyrian were the same damn thing.
> No ancient author provides a gloss for the name, so a connectionIt sounds at least plausible, remaining still an hypothesis without
> with Alb. bardhë is motivated primarily by wishful thinking.
> Bardu:lis could be etymologised in other ways, more in accordance
> with the IE onomastic tendencies, e.g. as 'having a (small) beard'
> from *bHardH- (cf. Barbula as a Latin cognomen).