From: george knysh
Message: 24020
Date: 2003-06-29
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, g <george.st@...>*****GK: Another thought: they may not have been big,
> wrote:
>
> >
> > This mugel-m�gel-mogil-magur-etc. seems to be more
> than
> coincidence...
>
>
> GK: Let's follow this up for a moment. We have
> a word in at
> least 3 IE language families with meanings that can
> be related to the
> actual 'appearance' of kurgans. As to size. The
> earliest kurgans
> weren't very big as far as I know. Not more than
> about 2 meters, and
> usually smaller. And this persisted for millennia