Re: [tied] Re: Creole Romance? [was: Thracian , summing up]

From: P&G
Message: 23928
Date: 2003-06-27

> although much of Latin grammar survives, much is also lost, plus
> a whole new type of past forms are introduced, those based
> on 'habeo',

This construction exists in Latin. I posted some examples from classical
Latin on this list a while ago. All that happened is that with the change
of pronunciation of /b/ to a fricative, the distinctions in the old system
between, say, amabit and amavit, broke down. So other elements already
present in Latin were used more often - and with ensuing phonetic
developments the new Romance systems emerged. All thoroughly Latin+phonetic
changes. Not a sign of pidgin/creole or anything else, except the normal,
regular, unconditioned, developments within - note the word - within a
language.

Peter

Previous in thread: 23912
Next in thread: 23929
Previous message: 23927
Next message: 23929

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts