From: tolgs001
Message: 21967
Date: 2003-05-16
>"viu" (alternance g'iu).we can't take this "g'iu" for granted.
>5) is there no wonder that beside "viaTa"singular: viu & vie
>there is nothinf in Rom. from the lot of
>derivatives within Latin?
>(vivum
>AlexGeorge