tolgs001 wrote:
> Between them there didn't exist a direct lineage: we
> shouldn't care whether Hung. gond and bolond are based
> on IE etymons - what's important, in Romanian they're
> borrowed from Hungarian, along with such important words
> as "hotar, a hotãrî, chip, a chibzui". Much in the same way
> as Romanian borrowed modern lexical items from the
> international pool of Latinisms and French lexems, but via..
> Russian and German.
>
> George
look, I begun with PIE *ghe(n)d. the phonetical evolution is absolut OK
in Rom. For marking the way of the hungarians you have to search out
where they could loan this word. In the indo-iranians languages, in the
slavic or how ever. If you got the answer, show it. The advantage of my
argumentation is that the word is a PIE word, has PIE cognates, is to
find in Rom. and Albanian and most of all, the phonetical evolution is
absolutely in concordance with Rom. Lang.
Ass for your "botã" I will like you to keep informed that the semanstims
of this word is not only the one of "bâtã" ( and how you say, the one of
hungarian bot?) but this means , with a slavic word "doniTã". The word
has an unknown etymology and it seems it is a derivative like "botca".
When you find the language wherefrom the hungarians got it we reopen the
topic. Einverstanded?
P.S. do not forget how many valahians have been on the throne of Hungary
and how many valahians have made a big part of their nobily begining
with ... Olahu. The influence on hungarian should be easy explained.