Re: [tied] Labiovelar in Latin

Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

> On Thu, 15 May 2003 18:40:28 +0200, alex_lycos <altamix@...>
> wrote:
>
>> In what turned the labiovelar *gW in latin?
>
> /w/, /gw/ after /n/

I understand that after /n/ the PIE *gW became eiter /w/ or /gw/. Do I
understand it right?
What about the other cases where the PIE *gW was in initiale position,
like in PIe *gWa-?