From: John
Message: 20327
Date: 2003-03-25
> You are not discussing a population movement so your point isGlen I was refering to an actual movement of population, not just a
> misleading yet again.
> There is a general _cultural_ movement from the southGlen, it is not just archaeology that suggests an actual movement of
> Caspian to the north Pontic and one from Anatolia into Europe during
> the neolithic, if I understand correctly. This does not equate with
> population movement because cultural spread can be motivated by
> trade (and we know there was much trade in the neolithic so this is
> highly probable, in fact).
> You exxagerate the probability. There are still linguistic reasonsGlen I dont place Anatolia as the origin of IE. I would suggest
> to avoid an Anatolian origin of IE.
> Unfortunately, I've managed to lose that book and I need to replaceGlen This is what I am talking of - the route that connects the
> it. However, those maps don't show things very well. I don't
> remember anything in those maps indicating "Place pre-IE here".
> It's showing the spread of **Nostratic**, not just IE, is it not? I
> also remember that IE itself was not placed in Anatolia in those
> maps.