From: alex_lycos
Message: 19496
Date: 2003-03-02
----- Original Message -----
From: <gs001ns@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:38 AM
Subject: [tied] Re: Fata morgana [Re: Lusitanians]
> >There is just a compilation of ancient tribes names in
> >Europe wherefrom I exstracted for Spain some and I showed the
> >corespondance in Romanian
>
> Those are mere... "cognates". You don't bother to
> ask yourself: "How about their meaning in the ancient
> language and in Romanian?" and "What do I know of those
> Romanian localities? When were they founded, in which
> circumstances, by whom?"
cognates means a relationship. Did you meant "coincidence maybe"?
>
> >If there is "comanesti" in conection with "cumans"
>
> Of course, there is: every topo-/anthroponym such as
> Coman, Comanici (-> Nadia Comaneci!), Comanescu,
> Comana, Comanesti etc. evokes the ethnonym of that
> Turkic branch
Of course=? Which are the arguments they are related to cumans and not
earlier?
>
> >CorneSti, CorbeSti, Magura..
>
> Have you ever heard of "corn, corb, magura"? :)
>
> >Do you intend to say there are not village's name
> >or what should mean here this "watchamacallit"?
>
> You're kiddin', don't you? The Carnival being
> over only next Wednesday. ;-)
>
> Helau,
> George
No . I just thought you mean they shouldn't be Romanian villages name.
The relation between corb, magura , corn is more as clear.