Re: Fata morgana [Re: Lusitanians]

Alex wrote:

>I don't belive.

It doesn't matter.

>There is just a compilation of ancient tribes names in
>Europe wherefrom I exstracted for Spain some and I showed the
>corespondance in Romanian.

Those are mere... "cognates". You don't bother to
ask yourself: "How about their meaning in the ancient
language and in Romanian?" and "What do I know of those
Romanian localities? When were they founded, in which
circumstances, by whom?"

>If there is "comanesti" in conection with "cumans"

Of course, there is: every topo-/anthroponym such as
Coman, Comanici (-> Nadia Comaneci!), Comanescu,
Comana, Comanesti etc. evokes the ethnonym of that
Turkic branch.

>(BTW you know how they called themselves and who told
>them "cummans"?) I am not sure.

If you're interested, there is enough information on
the Cumans, even on the Net.

>Until the Mongol EMire destroyed them?

By using this word, I understand that the Mongols
put an end to the Cuman's own khanate (Desht-i-KIptchaq).
Besides, in my previous post, I went on saying that
a part of the Cumans went back to the eastern steppes
where they "melted" in the population of the khanate
of the "Golden Horde." I mentioned this, didn't I?

>CorneSti, CorbeSti, Magura..

Have you ever heard of "corn, corb, magura"? :)

>Do you intend to say there are not village's name
>or what should mean here this "watchamacallit"?

You're kiddin', don't you? The Carnival being
over only next Wednesday. ;-)

Helau,
George