From: tgpedersen
Message: 11754
Date: 2001-12-11
> --- In cybalist@..., "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...> wrote:be
> > The variation of short u/o was allophonic in early Germanic. To
> more precise, *u was lowered to [o] in some positions, and Proto-place
> Germanic had no *o phoneme. The lowering was conditioned by the
> presence of *a in the next syllable, so it would not have taken
> in *gutiska-. Some of the earliest records of the Goths' ethnonymcorrection:
> have <gut->, so it doesn't rest on my inferences.
> >
> > Piotr
>*got-a-, *got-isk- (analogy)
> *gut-a-, *gut-isk-
> *got-a-, *gut-isk- (a-lowering)
> *got-a-, *göt-isk- (umlaut)
> *göt-a-, *göt-isk- (back-formation, cf. German <Däne>)
> Get-a-, *get-isk- (unrounding)
>
> As for the existence of -isk- in Thracian ethnonyms cf. <Scordisci>
> (unfortunately for me without umlaut, so I'll claim dialect
> differences).
>
> Torsten