Re: [tied] Re: [pieml] PIE rhotacism

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 11144
Date: 2001-11-15

 
----- Original Message -----
From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Re: [pieml] PIE rhotacism

> Pokorny also gives G. udnás and pl. udá: (< *udo:r). Are those forms
only given by the grammarians?

You are right, they are attested though extremely rare Rigvedic forms. The paradigm is highly defective in Sanskrit but not to the extent I thought it was.
 
<uda-> is relatively frequent as a composition form.
 
Piotr

Previous in thread: 11141
Next in thread: 11146
Previous message: 11143
Next message: 11145

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts