Re: [tied] xodit'

It's hiding in the non-iterative preterite *s^Id-l- (: *xod-i-l-), not unlike English wend, which gave forth a new suppletive past tense of <go> before its other forms were found disposable.

Piotr

----- Original Message -----
From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal

To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:17 AM

Subject: Re: [tied] xodit'

On Thu, 01 Nov 2001 00:06:19 +0100, Miguel Carrasquer Vidal <mcv@...> wrote: >On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 22:21:24 -0000, "Sergejus Tarasovas" ><S.Tarasovas@...> wrote: >>But where is that **xosti? **s^esti, rather (assuming *Xedh- vs. *Xodh-ei-).

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.