From: tgpedersen@...
Message: 10851
Date: 2001-11-01
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2001 00:06:19 +0100, Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> <mcv@...> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 22:21:24 -0000, "Sergejus Tarasovas"
> ><S.Tarasovas@...> wrote:
>
> >>But where is that **xosti?
>
> **s^esti, rather (assuming *Xedh- vs. *Xodh-ei-).
>
>
--- In cybalist@..., "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...> wrote:
> It's hiding in the non-iterative preterite *s^Id-l- (: *xod-i-l-),
not unlike English wend, which gave forth a new suppletive past tense
of <go> before its other forms were found disposable.
>
> Piotr
>
>
In case you guys are looking for a cognate: Germ. *skeutan "shoot"
cf. Da. 'skyde fra' "push (boat) away from shore"? IE *(s)kewd- I
suppose. Pretty close (-d:dH-).
Torsten