From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Message: 10826
Date: 2001-11-01
>On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 22:21:24 -0000, "Sergejus Tarasovas"**s^esti, rather (assuming *Xedh- vs. *Xodh-ei-).
><S.Tarasovas@...> wrote:
>
>>--- In cybalist@..., "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...> wrote:
>>> Mmm... What about *nesti, *le^zti, *plyti, *vesti (*vez-), *vesti
>>(*ved-), etc. vs. *nositi, *laziti, *plavati, *voziti, *voditi? Is
>>there anything "sessive" about the latter series? The difference is
>>between one continuous action and iterative movement ("around", "up
>>and down", "to and fro"). How does one sit to and fro?
>>>
>>
>>But where is that **xosti?
>
>That should have been (but isn't) **s^e^sti.