From: João Simões Lopes Filho
Message: 5037
Date: 2000-12-12
----- Original Message -----
From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal <mcv@...>
To: <cybalist@egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] PIE *h3 and PPIE **n
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:27:33 -0200, João Simões Lopes Filho
> <jodan99@...> wrote:
>
> >Can This r/n alternation explain the Latin marcus and Germanic *hamaraz,
> >"hammer", Slav kamy "stone", Greek akmon "stone". *kom-en- / -er- ?
>
> I don't recognize <marcus>. Germanic *hamaraz is related to the words
> for "stone", but the story is rather complicated. There is the
> curious alternation between *kam- and *ak^m-. The neuters in *-men
> don't participate in the **-n > *-r shift, and these words are not
> even neuters (Slav. kamy < *kamo:n-s; Gmc. hamar-az). There is also
> the occurrence of byforms with *-l (MHG hamel "rock", Norw. <humul>
> "stone"; Gothic <himins> "sky", ModE. "heaven" vs. German <Himmel>,
> Du. <hemel>) to further complicate matters. So no, my theory is too
> simple to explain this.
>
> >And the adjectives in -nos/-ros? cf. Greek kyknos "swan" and Sanskrit
shukra
> >"white, shining"
>
> Yes, that's what I claimed. Note further the interactions between
> u-stem adjectives and -rós (and *-nós) adjectives in Armenian (N.
> barjr (*bhrg^hr-), G. barju (*bhrg^hu-), NPl. barjunk` (*bhrg^hon-)),
> Tocharian (replacement of *-ú by *-rós: swa:re "sweet", pärkare
> "long").
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...
>
>
>
>