From: Nicholas Bodley
Message: 4492
Date: 2005-03-24
>> From: Peter T. Daniels [mailto:grammatim@...]Peter, I think you are referring to what was available several years ago.
>> Standard Mac fonts don't _have_ edh or thorn.
> I find that difficult to believe, though not having a Mac in front of meWell, if you're using MacRoman encoding, no. But there must be others that
> at the moment I can't prove otherwise.
>> Icelandic isn't one of the many languages they're designed to
>> accommodate.
> Hungarian is, but I gather standard Windows fonts don't have theI'm essentially certain that the WGL4 fonts do render Hungarian just fine,
> long-umlaut diacritic.
> Well, I know what an umlaut diacritic is, but don't know how thatMost likely, someone else has already replied. Unicode calls them "double
> differs from a "long-umlaut diacritic". If you could point me to a
> sample of one, I'd be interested to find out.