Mark E. Shoulson wrote:

>
> Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
> >Michael Everson wrote:
> >
> >
> >>At 08:22 -0400 2004-07-11, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Then you should be chastising Unicode, not the deviser of the
> >>>terminology, since the terminology seems to have been taken over
> >>>without understanding and inaccurately.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>If you have an issue with the definitions in the Unicode Standard,
> >>please be specific about each of them.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >How would I know what they are? Perhaps the definitions are perfectly
> >accurate. All I see is quotations showing the terms being misused.
> >
> >
> Then perhaps, instead of repeatedly chastising everyone who asks a
> question to read all of your works, you should read the works you're
> commenting on before questioning them.

You gonna donate me a copy?
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...