Michael Everson wrote:

>
> At 09:32 -0400 2004-07-11, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
>
> >Then perhaps, instead of repeatedly chastising everyone who asks a
> >question to read all of your works, you should read the works you're
> >commenting on before questioning them.
>
> The definitions (which are not necessarily exhaustive) can be found
> in the Unicode Glossary at
> http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode4.0.0/b1.pdf
>
> Further discussion of how some of the terms are used is found inside
> some of the other chapters of the standard; I can post links to that
> after Peter Daniels has had an opportunity to read the Glossary terms
> so that he can see what definitions Unicode is making. If there are
> flaws or omissions, I (as one of the members of the editorial
> committee) will be pleased to discuss the definitions with regard to
> improving them.
>
> Peter: If there are flaws in the definitions, and your expertise
> could improve them, please help us to do so. It should not take very
> much time; there are not so many of them.

So someone took the two terms from me but made up their own definitions.
What am I supposed to do about that?
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...