From: Michael Everson
Message: 1752
Date: 2003-09-27
>I discovered this list while doing research for a children's book onHow interesting.
>the history of alphabets.
>I would very much appreciate it if someone here could advise me.I'll try. Partly because I lived in Tucson for many years. ;-)
>HIEROGLYPHICSBecause the mouth is used for the R. So if you're doing an alphabet
>* In popular literature it is given that an alphabetic equivalent for the
>letter, L, exists as the lion glyph.
>I have found two sources that state the lion represents theThe recumbant lion stands for rw 'lion' but is also used for the
>bi-consonant, RW. Is this correct?
>* One might assume that the alphabetic (uniliteral) glyph values deriveBest not to assume.
>acrophonically.
>Is this so, and if so, is there somewhere a list of those originalI don't think we have evidence for the "names" of the, ah, characters
>words? Would it be accurate to use such words as the "names" of the
>glyphs? Or is it either meaningless or impossible to attribute
>"names" to the glyphs?
>UGARITICSome names are, actually attested. I've a list somewhere. We used
>* Speaking again of names, I've never seen names attributed to the
>Ugaritic characters. Would it be fair to say that since Ugaritic was
>a semitic language, the names of the letters were probably similar
>to those of the later Phoenician letters?
>* Of the final three characters in the Ugaritic alphabet, used particlarlyThat's correct.
>for writing Hurrian, am I correct to believe that the first two were vowels
>and the third was a sibilant, not a vowel?
>LATINaspiratio.
>* Emperor Claudius introduced three new letters to the Latin alphabet
>(although they were abandoned after his passing): digamma inversum,
>antisigma, and ??? Can anyone tell me what that third letter was called?
>MiscellaneousHe said it in 1858. Or 1865. Apparently it is quoted in Basic
>* I've been unable to locate the exact origin of the popular quote by
>Alphonse de Lamartine, "Letters are symbols which turn matter into spirit."