From: webmaster@...
Message: 1751
Date: 2003-09-26
>on
>
>
>
> I've been on this fine list for about a year and feel it's time to
>
> introduce myself. My name is Randall Hunt and I make my living in graphic
>
> arts -- now mostly computer graphics, tho I owned a printing shop for ten
>
> years. I discovered this list while doing research for a children's book
>someone
> the history of alphabets. I've had a number of questions on the subject
>
> that I would have put to this list but most of them were eventually
>
> resolved through diligent web research. I've become acutely aware of the
>
> limitations of using the web for factual material -- there is a lot of
>
> misinformation out there -- but since I live in central Arizona (USA,
>
> beautiful Jerome), I don't have ready access to extensive libraries. As I
>
> am nearing the end of my project, there remain a few items that I haven't
>
> been able to resolve completely. I would very much appreciate it if
>Ugaritic
> here could advise me.
>
>
>
> HIEROGLYPHICS
>
> * In popular literature it is given that an alphabetic equivalent for the
>
> letter, L, exists as the lion glyph. Yet academic literature omits the
>
> glyph from the twenty-four uni-consonantal signs, notwithstanding its
>
> apparent correlation in Champollion's decipherment. I have found two
>
> sources that state the lion represents the bi-consonant, RW. Is this
>
> correct?
>
>
>
> * One might assume that the alphabetic (uniliteral) glyph values derive
>
> acrophonically. Is this so, and if so, is there somewhere a list of those
>
> original words? Would it be accurate to use such words as the "names" of
>
> the glyphs? Or is it either meaningless or impossible to attribute "names"
>
> to the glyphs?
>
>
>
> UGARITIC
>
> * Speaking again of names, I've never seen names attributed to the
>vowels
> characters. Would it be fair to say that since Ugaritic was a semitic
>
> language, the names of the letters were probably similar to those of the
>
> later Phoenician letters?
>
>
>
> * Of the final three characters in the Ugaritic alphabet, used particlarly
>
> for writing Hurrian, am I correct to believe that the first two were
>
> and the third was a sibilant, not a vowel?
>
>
>
> LATIN
>
> * Emperor Claudius introduced three new letters to the Latin alphabet
>
> (although they were abandoned after his passing): digamma inversum,
>
> antisigma, and ??? Can anyone tell me what that third letter was called?
>
>
>
> Miscellaneous
>
> * I've been unable to locate the exact origin of the popular quote by
>
> Alphonse de Lamartine, "Letters are symbols which turn matter into spirit."
>
> One source implied this was a title of one of his books. Does anyone know
>
> if this is so, or can anyone tell me where/when he wrote this?
>
>
>
> Thank you all very much,
>
>
>
> Randall Hunt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> www.egroups.com/group/qalam - world's writing systems.
>
> To unsubscribe: qalam-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
>
>