From: Stephen Chrisomalis
Message: 1135
Date: 2003-01-23
> Stephen Chrisomalis recently said:and
>
> > 3) A related point: Roman numerals are used in dozens of countries by
> > millions of individuals, and primarily by members of educated (middle
> > upper) classes. They not only represent tradition; they connoteprestige.
>v,
> Tim Partridge wrote:
>
> We have stopped using the long i for a final i in the numerals in the UK.
> Does that apply elsewhere? E.g. i, ii, iii, iv, v, vi VS j, ij, iij, iv,
> vj? Does anyone still use the original form of four (iiii)?The use of j instead of i in numeral-final position has not been used
> > 4) We continue to use Roman numerals for one major pragmatic reason,which
> > is to distinguish one set of enumerated things from another. Forinstance,
> > prefatory material in a book is usually paginated in Roman numerals tomain
> > distinguish it from the Hindu-Arabic paginated body of the text.
>
> I thought this was partly a matter of convenience for the printer. The
> body of the text can be typeset with its own sequence of page numbersCould very well be; I'm not an expert in printing history. Obviously, we
> without worrying how long the contents pages will be or the foreword and
> other front matter.