Re: passambhaya.m

Dear Jim,

Thank you, that was what I was looking for :)

Best wishes,

Yuttadhammo

On 08/13/2010 06:07 PM, Jim Anderson wrote:
>
> Dear Phra Yuttadhammo,
>
> Kaccaayana has a rule (optional) for the "a.m" ending in the nom.
> sing. of present participles (see Kacc 186), I also glanced at the Mmd
> commentary where it gets a bit more complicated. Basically, "a.m" is
> the substitute of the "nta" suffix of the stem "passambhayanta-"
>
> Jim
>
> > Dear Bryan,
> >
> > Thank you, I just don't get how it can be a present participle...
> what
> > is the suffix? Normally a present participle has to have an "anta"
> or
> > "maana" suffix, no?
> >
> > Sorry for my ignorance...
> >
> > Yuttadhammo
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]