Re: passambhaya.m

From: Jim Anderson
Message: 2974
Date: 2010-08-13

Dear Phra Yuttadhammo,

Kaccaayana has a rule (optional) for the "a.m" ending in the nom.
sing. of present participles (see Kacc 186), I also glanced at the Mmd
commentary where it gets a bit more complicated. Basically, "a.m" is
the substitute of  the "nta" suffix of the stem "passambhayanta-"

Jim

> Dear Bryan,
>
> Thank you, I just don't get how it can be a present participle...
what
> is the suffix?  Normally a present participle has to have an "anta"
or
> "maana" suffix, no?
>
> Sorry for my ignorance...
>
> Yuttadhammo



Previous in thread: 2973
Next in thread: 2975
Previous message: 2973
Next message: 2975

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts