From: Nina van Gorkom
Message: 15509
Date: 2011-07-06
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> A future passive participle and a
> gerundive (also called a gerundivium which is its Latin name) are
> the same thing - a "future passive participle" (another name for a
> gerundivium) which is a verbal adjective, with the meaning "to be
> [past
> participle]" or "should be [past participle]", or "ought to be
> [past participle]."
>
> In this case vandiyaa is a gerundive meaning "to be
> praised" ("ought to be praised" or "should be praised") modifying
> the Buddhaas; the Sanskrit equivalent is vandya ("to be praised"),
> so vandiyaa, with the extra epenthetic -i- must be an eastern form
> (which is
> very common in Paali, e.g. ariya for ayya from Skt. arya.)
>
> vanditabba is derived from Skt. vanditavya which also means to be
> praised and is also a future passive participle, gerundive, a
> verbal adjective modifying Tathaagataas.. In Skt. there are three
> principle endings which create a gerundive: -ya, -tavya and -
> aniiya,, all added to the root in its gu.na grade. Paali also has
> more than one form as is apparent.
>
> All gerundives are passive. Gerunds are usually active (but can
> also be passive), but are always indeclinable. Since these
> gerundive forms (vandiyaa and vanditabbaa) are both in agreement
> with a noun (in nom. pl.) then one knows right away that they must
> be gerundives (verbal adjectives), not gerunds. The gerund form
> from the verb vandati is vanditvaa and it usu. means "having
> praised" and would generally take an object in the accusative.
>