From: Ong Yong Peng
Message: 9521
Date: 2005-12-05
--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Nina van Gorkom wrote:
Sa.nkhaara has different meanings depending on the context.
San.khaara dhammas are dhammas, phenomena, that are conditioned.
This, I think is the meaning here in this text. We have to think of
the saying: all conditioned phenomena are impermanent, dukkha, and
all dhammas are anattaa (including nibbaana).
Sa.nkhaarakkhanahda are all cetasikas except feeling and saññaa.
Further, there are still other meanings.
> 1. "A.t.thaanameta.m, bhikkhave, anavakaaso ya.m di.t.thisampanno
> puggalo ka~nci sa`nkhaara.m niccato upagaccheyya.
> "This is not the standpoint, monks: there is not a chance that,
> endowed with right views, a person should consider any determination
> as permanent.
N: Another option: PTS has; it is impossible, it cannot come to pass.
Standpoint is difficult to fit in here, I think.
instead of determination (for sa.nkhaara): phenomenon.
> 3. "A.t.thaanameta.m, bhikkhave, anavakaaso ya.m di.t.thisampanno
> puggalo ka~nci dhamma.m attato upagaccheyya.
> "This is not the standpoint, monks: there is not a chance that,
> endowed with right views, a person should consider anything as his
> own.
N: should consider any reality (dhamma) as the self. attato is the
ablative of attaa, self. The wrong view of self. This in paralel to
niccaa, sukha.