Re: SV: SV: [Pali] AN1.15.1-28 A.t.thaana (1/5)

Dear Ole and friends,

I am not sure, but I thought it is just another way of putting it.
The following three mean the same to me:

(1) a person endowed with right views should regard any sankhara as
impermanent

(2) a person endowed with right views should regard any sankhara of
being impermanent

(3) a person endowed with right views should regard any sankhara from
being permanent

Please correct me if I am wrong.


metta,
Yong Peng.

--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Ole Holten Pind wrote:

only the alternative below is correct

> a person endowed with right views should regard any sankhara as
> impermanent
>
> Putting the sentence back:
>
> "This is not the standpoint, monks: there is not a chance that,
> endowed with right views, a person should consider any sankhara
> from (correct "from" to as!) OP
> being (delete "being") permanent.