Dear Alan and friends,

I am proposing the following:

pp: past participle
ppr: present participle
ppot: potential participle

I find this rather easy to remember. But, I leave it to you to decide.


metta,
Yong Peng.

--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Alan McClure wrote:

Would you be opposed to prp instead since ppr could also mean (p)ast
(p)a(r)ticiple as easily as it could mean (p)resent (p)a(r)ticiple?
prp would more clearly be (pr)esent (p)articiple.

> ppr: present participle