From: siteby
Message: 8651
Date: 2005-08-20
--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, "rjkjp1" <rjkjp1@...> wrote:
> --- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, "Bhikkhu Pesala" <pesala@...> wrote:
> > > If one thinks that jhaana is essential, as several teachers
claim,
> one
> > may cultivate it for a year or two first. I don't see any harm
in
> that,
> > unless one dies before finishing the meditation course. I am
sure
> that
> > insight will come much more easily if one has already gained
jhaana
> > previously. However adept one becomes in jhaana, one may fail to
gain
> > magga and phala if one's perfections are not yet ripe, or if one
> fails
> > to find the appropriate guidance.
> >
> > ++++
> Dear venerable Pesala,
> It is often said that attaining jhana makes vipassana easier.
However
> while all kusala is supportive of insight I do not see this as
being
> so clearcut.
> The ones who could use jhana as basis for insight had mastery of
jhana,
> something beyond the capacity of beings of this time. Someone
could
> strive for years to attain jhana and not succeed, or take some
pleasant
> or strange concentration experience to be jhana. The ancient
> commentaries suggest that at this late stage in the sasana that
> sukkavipassaka is the most viable.
> Robertk