Re: another logical fallacy

From: rett
Message: 8625
Date: 2005-08-18

>
>The fallacy of this proposition is it treats it as only two possibities
>instead of acknowledging others. For example, a third alternative would be:
>
>I am a fool AND I know nothing about the teacher or their meditation method.
>Limiting me to only being a fool OR being ignorant of the teacher's method
>deprives me of the possibility of being both foolish AND ignorant. I insist
>on having the freedom to be both.

I like you, frank :-)

Previous in thread: 8624
Next in thread: 8626
Previous message: 8624
Next message: 8626

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts